Distributed 2-Voting: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Distributed 2-Voting (view source)

Revision as of 15:22, 20 June 2022

424 bytes added , 1 year ago

m

Add categories, fixup capitalization

VisualWikitext

Kristomun

1,202

edits

Revision as of 20:31, 27 June 2020 (view source) Aldo Tragni (talk \| contribs) (Procedure diagram added) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 15:22, 20 June 2022 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) m (Add categories, fixup capitalization)
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: [[File:D2V procedure.svg\|thumb]]▼ Distributed 2-Voting (D2V) is a [[Single Member system\|Single-Winner]] and [[Multi-Member System\|Multi-Winner]], [[Cardinal voting systems]].▼ ▲Distributed 2-Voting (D2V) is a [[Single Member system\|~~Single~~single-~~Winner~~]] and [[Multi-Member System\|~~Multi~~multi-~~Winner~~winner]], [[Cardinal voting systems\|cardinal voting method]]. ==Procedure== ▲[[File:D2V procedure.svg\|thumb]] Voter score candidates with range [-5,+5] or [-9,+9] without the value 0. Each vote is split into two votes, which are then normalized to 100 points: Line 31 ⟶ 32: \end{equation}</math> ===Example of ~~Vote~~vote conversion=== Original vote: [-5\|-4\|-3\|-2\|-1\|1 \|2 \|3 \|4 \|5 ] Line 52 ⟶ 53: ===Unknown candidates=== Unrated candidates (unknown ones) receive 0 points. The vote, after normalization, consists of 100 points distributed, and starting from this observation: # Inin the positive vote, it's better to favor the approved candidates, instead of using limited points on unknown candidates. # Inin the negative vote, it's better to favor the less disapproved candidate (compared to the most disapproved), instead of using limited points on unknown candidates. # ~~Rare case:~~ if there was only one disapproved candidate in the negative vote, the voter could ~~assign~~use -1the 100 negative topoints ~~all~~on unknown candidates favoring them unfairly. This case is rare because: if the candidates are few, then ~~they~~there are ~~hardly~~no unknown candidates; if there are many candidates then it's very likely that at least two differently disapproved candidates are present. Overall D2V doesn't favor unknown candidates. D2V supports that unknown candidates must not be favored in any way. ===Independence from results=== Line 133 ⟶ 134: * The positive and negative votes always have ratings >=0, in the count. The concept of "disadvantaging a candidate by favoring all others" doesn't exist in this category of methods. * if all negative votes are null at start (all values equal to 0), then the method becomes equivalent to that in which 2 votes are not used (ex. S2V without negative ratings in the original vote, is equivalent to SV). [[Category:Multi-winner voting methods]] [[Category:Cardinal voting methods]]