Distributed Score Voting: Difference between revisions

Line 125:

! rowspan=1 | [[Smith criterion|Smith]]

! rowspan=1 | [[Pareto criterion|Pareto]]

! rowspan=1 | ~~[[Independence of irrelevant alternatives|~~IIA]]

! rowspan=1 | IIA*

! rowspan=1 | [[w:Independence of clones criterion|Clone proof]]

! rowspan=1 style="border-left:2px solid #a0a0a0;" | [[Monotonicity criterion|Monotone]]

Line 155:

|}

IIA*: X is a set containing all the preferred candidates over B. If I add C a less appreciated candidate than the candidates in X and B, then all candidates in X continue to be preferred over B.

[[IIA]]: when candidates X and Y aren't part of the [[Smith set]], they are excluded without being evaluated, therefore it's not possible to know which are the group's preference between X and Y. The group's preference between X and Y are evaluated only when they are both in the [[Smith set]] and in this case it can be said that adding an irrelevant candidate doesn't change the group's preference between X and Y .

All the criteria not met are linked to the fact that, through tactical votes, it's possible add / remove a candidate from the [[Smith set]].