Electoral system: Difference between revisions

(Aligning prose with new title)
Line 66:
Voting systems can be abstracted as mathematical functions that select between choices based on the [[utility]] of each option for each voter. This greatly resembles a [[social welfare function]] as studied in welfare economics and many of the same considerations can be studied. For aspects such as simplicity, dispute, and fraud, the practical implementation is far more important than the abstract function. However, the choice of abstract function puts some constraints on the implementation. For instance, certain voting systems such as First Past the Post, [[Schulze method|Schulze]], or Borda Count can be tallied in one distributed step, others such as IRV require centralization, and others such as multi-round runoff require multiple polling rounds.
 
[[W:Social utility efficiency|Social utility efficiency]] (also known as Voter Satisfaction Index or Voter Satisfaction Efficiency) and its inverse, [[Bayesian regret]], isare used to measure how much [[utility]] a voting method tends to give to voters. [[Smith efficiency]] and [[W:Condorcet efficiency|Condorcet efficiency]] are used to measure how [[Smith-efficient]] a voting method is.
 
== Definitions ==