4,193
edits
Electowiki talk:The caucus: Difference between revisions
→Editing velocity: I would have written a shorter comment, but I did not have the time :-D
No edit summary |
(→Editing velocity: I would have written a shorter comment, but I did not have the time :-D) |
||
Line 295:
: If we had lots of users, we could experiment with Approval-y editing where the users could mark which paragraphs they consider important and not. But we don't have enough users for the jury theorem to work, and even if we did, just coding the thing would take a lot of time. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 00:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
:: Thanks for weighing in so quickly! I've always loved the Pascal quote in that link above ("I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time"), but many of the others are also apropos. I think it would be fun to experiment with some sort of Approval-y editing method, but I also agree that it would take a lot of time, and the cost/benefit ratio is probably too high (and out of reach, at the moment). -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 00:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
| |||