Evaluative Proportional Representation: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (Clarify that this is a weighted PR method (like Chamberlin-Courant; unlike Monroe).) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure). |
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure). |
||
{{stub}} |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
Revision as of 15:04, 27 February 2022
Evaluative Proportional Representation (EPR) is a proportional extension of Majority Judgment. It is highly related to the Expanding Approvals Rule.[1]
Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure).
This page is a stub - please add to it.