FAIR-V: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 76:
Overall, FAIR-V is extremely resistant to frontrunners strategies.
===[[Tactical voting#Pushover|Monotonicity failure]]===
Using the [[Yee diagram]] it was possible to observe that FAIR-V procedure is extremely resistant to the failure of monotonicity<ref>{{cite web|url=https://forum.electionscience.org/t/yee-diagramm-strong-monotonicity-failure-resistance/823|title=Strong monotonicity failure resistance|author=Aldo Tragni|language=en|access-date=2020-01-9}}</ref>, so the [[Tactical voting#Pushover|Push-over]] strategy can be considered practically absent.
==Voting systems comparison==
Line 82 ⟶ 86:
FAIR-V is more resistant to strategies using range [0,2], but has a more complex procedure than [[PRO-V]].
==References==
<references/>
[[Category:Single-winner voting methods]]
| |||