Instant Runoff Normalized Ratings: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Unfortunately usually the best strategy in IRNR[p] is simply to (strategically) plurality-vote, i.e. |
Unfortunately usually the best strategy in IRNR[p] is simply to (strategically) plurality-vote, i.e. |
||
giving all |
giving all candidates except one a rating of zero. |
||
This is true whenever there are two "frontrunner" candidates judged to be far more likely |
This is true whenever there are two "frontrunner" candidates judged to be far more likely |
||
to win than the others and p is finite. |
to win than the others and p is finite. (Then vote for the best among these two.) |
||
If p is infinite IRNR just becomes equivalent to [[range voting]] |
|||
in the range [-1, 1] with an extra rule demanding that the best- or worst-rated |
in the range [-1, 1] with an extra rule demanding that the best- or worst-rated |
||
candidate must have a rating with absolute value 1. |
candidate must have a rating with absolute value 1. |
||