Majority Judgment: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikipedia}}
{{Wikipedia}}


'''Majority Judgment''' is a single-winner [[voting system]] proposed by Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki. Voters freely [[Score voting|score]] each candidate in one of several named qualities, for instance from "excellent" to "bad". Each quality is associated with a numeric score and the candidate with the highest [[median]] score is the winner. If more than one candidate has the same median grade, a tiebreaker is used which sees how "broad" that median grade is. Majority Judgment can be considered as a form of [[Bucklin voting]] which allows equal ranks.
'''Majority Judgment''' is a single-winner [[voting system]] proposed by [[Michel Balinski]] and Rida Laraki. Voters freely [[Score voting|score]] each candidate in one of several named qualities, for instance from "excellent" to "bad". Each quality is associated with a numeric score and the candidate with the highest [[median]] score is the winner. If more than one candidate has the same median grade, a tiebreaker is used which sees how "broad" that median grade is. Majority Judgment can be considered as a form of [[Bucklin voting]] which allows equal ranks.


==Voting process==
==Voting process==