| Display title | Majority Judgment |
| Default sort key | Majority Judgment |
| Page length (in bytes) | 9,142 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 260 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 3 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | 187.143.6.208 (talk) |
| Date of page creation | 15:43, 28 June 2011 |
| Latest editor | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 17:28, 21 April 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 20 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 1 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Majority Judgment is a single-winner voting system proposed by Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki.[1][2] Voters freely score each candidate in one of several named qualities, for instance from "excellent" to "bad". Each quality is associated with a numeric score and the candidate with the highest median score is the winner. If more than one candidate has the same median grade, a tiebreaker is used which sees how "broad" that median grade is. Majority Judgment can be considered as a form of Bucklin voting which allows equal ranks. |
