Majority criterion: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Added "majority criterion" due to modern use as well as use on EM. Added citation using "majority criterion" to refer to this criterion, as well.)
(Added reference for "majority favorite criterion" usage as well. It's a bit weak: Durand et al use "majority criterion" in their later published paper, but the only other ref I could find is Dopp, which subject matter could distract from the point.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{wikipedia|Majority favorite criterion}}
{{wikipedia|Majority favorite criterion}}


The '''majority criterion''' or '''majority favorite criterion''' is a criterion for evaluating [[voting system]]s. It can be most simply thought of as "if a candidate would get >50% of the first preferences ([[FPP]] vote), that candidate should win". In other words, if a majority selects a candidate as their unique 1st choice, this candidate must win.<ref name="i696">{{cite journal | last=Schulze | first=Markus | title=A new monotonic, clone-independent, reversal symmetric, and condorcet-consistent single-winner election method | journal=Social Choice and Welfare | volume=36 | issue=2 | date=2011 | issn=0176-1714 | doi=10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4 | page=297|url=http://www.9mail.de/m-schulze/long.pdf}}</ref>
The '''majority criterion''' or '''majority favorite criterion''' is a criterion for evaluating [[voting system]]s. It can be most simply thought of as "if a candidate would get >50% of the first preferences ([[FPP]] vote), that candidate should win". In other words, if a majority selects a candidate as their unique 1st choice, this candidate must win.<ref name="i696">{{cite journal | last=Schulze | first=Markus | title=A new monotonic, clone-independent, reversal symmetric, and condorcet-consistent single-winner election method | journal=Social Choice and Welfare | volume=36 | issue=2 | date=2011 | issn=0176-1714 | doi=10.1007/s00355-010-0475-4 | page=297|url=http://www.9mail.de/m-schulze/long.pdf}}</ref><ref name="u698">{{cite web | last=Durand | first=François | last2=Mathieu | first2=Fabien | last3=Noirie | first3=Ludovic | title=Making most voting systems meet the Condorcet criterion reduces their manipulability | website=Archive ouverte HAL | date=2014-06-17 | url=https://hal.science/hal-01009134/ | access-date=2024-06-25}}</ref>


== Example ==
== Example ==