Method evaluation poll 2005: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
imported>James Green-Armytage |
imported>James Green-Armytage |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
SR JH JG KV MO |
SR JH JG KV MO |
||
[[ranked pairs]](WV) |
|||
[[ranked pairs]]( |
[[ranked pairs]](margins) |
||
⚫ | |||
[[ |
[[beatpath]](margins) |
||
⚫ | |||
[[ |
[[minmax]](WV) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
SR JH JG KV MO |
SR JH JG KV MO |
||
⚫ | |||
[[minmax]]( |
[[Smith//minmax]](WV) |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
[[Smith//minmax]](WV) |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
=== ranking input with approval cutoff === |
=== ranking input with approval cutoff === |
Revision as of 11:52, 14 June 2005
Particlar methods
Please rate the following methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on merit alone (That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate?)
binary input
SR JH JG KV MO Plurality Two round runoff Approval
ranking input
not Condorcet-efficient
SR JH JG KV MO Borda count IRV without equal rankings ER-IRV(whole) ER-IRV(fractional)
nearly Condorcet-efficient
SR JH JG KV MO minmax(pairwise opposition) CDTT,IRV
Condorcet-efficient
SR JH JG KV MO ranked pairs(WV) ranked pairs(margins) beatpath(WV) beatpath(margins) sequential dropping(WV) minmax(WV)
SR JH JG KV MO minmax(margins) Smith//minmax(WV) Smith//minmax(margins) Nanson Raynaud
ranking input with approval cutoff
SR JH JG KV MO
rating input
SR JH JG KV MO
ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise)
beatpath(cardinal pairwise)
other
CWO-ER-IRV(whole)
CWO-ER-IRV(fractional)
CWO-ranked pairs(WV)
CWO-ranked ballot plurality
minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO
beatpath(WV)with AERLO and ATLO