Method evaluation poll 2005: Difference between revisions
imported>Heitzig-j |
imported>James Green-Armytage |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Method evalutaion poll == |
|||
Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on '''merit alone'''. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed. |
Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on '''functional merit alone'''. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed. |
||
The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like. |
The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like. |
||
Feel free to add more methods to the poll, especially interesting ones! This goes without saying, but please don't change other people's ratings! The format of this poll is based on that of the [[Essential Questions|essential questions]] poll. Please identify yourself by your initials in the body of the poll, and in the participants section at the top of the poll. |
|||
Feel free to add new methods, especially interesting ones! |
|||
== the participants == |
|||
JG James Green-Armytage |
|||
CB Chris Benham |
|||
== the methods == |
|||
=== binary input === |
=== binary input === |
||
Revision as of 22:30, 14 June 2005
Please rate the following single-winner methods on a scale from 0 to 10, on functional merit alone. That is, leaving the issue of public salability aside, how well will the method perform in a large, contentious electorate? Decimal ratings are allowed.
The answers you give on your first pass through the survey need not be final. Please feel free to change/update your answers as many times as you like.
Feel free to add more methods to the poll, especially interesting ones! This goes without saying, but please don't change other people's ratings! The format of this poll is based on that of the essential questions poll. Please identify yourself by your initials in the body of the poll, and in the participants section at the top of the poll.
the participants
JG James Green-Armytage CB Chris Benham
the methods
binary input
JG CB ?? ?? ?? Plurality 2 2 Two round runoff 3 5 Approval 5 6 Random Ballot 1 1
ranking input
not Condorcet-efficient
JG CB ?? ?? ?? Borda count 1 4 IRV without equal rankings 4 7 ER-IRV(whole) 6 4 ER-IRV(fractional) 6 6 Bucklin 3 6
nearly Condorcet-efficient
JG CB ?? ?? ?? minmax(pairwise opposition) 3 8 CDTT,IRV 7 9.5
Condorcet-efficient
JG CB ?? ?? ?? ranked pairs(WV) 7 7 ranked pairs(margins) 2 4 river(wv) beatpath(WV) 7 7 beatpath(margins) 2 4 sequential dropping(WV) 7 ? minmax(WV) 3 ? minmax(margins) 1 ? Smith//minmax(WV) 6 ? Smith//minmax(margins) 2 ? Nanson 4 ? Raynaud 5 ?
ranking input with approval cutoff
JG CB ?? ?? ?? definite majority choice 6.5 8.5 approval weighted pairwise (e.g. with ranked pairs base) 9 8 approval margins 5.5 9
rating input
JG ?? ?? ?? ?? range voting (ratings summation) 5.5 median ratings 3 ranked pairs(cardinal pairwise) 10 beatpath(cardinal pairwise) 10
other
JG ?? ?? ?? ?? CWO-ER-IRV(whole) 7 CWO-ER-IRV(fractional) 8 CWO-ranked pairs(WV) 8 CWO-ranked ballot plurality 6 minmax(pairwise opposition) with AERLO and ATLO 4 beatpath(WV) with AERLO and ATLO 8 beatpath(WV) with strong/weak preference option 7.5
See also
Essential Questions poll