Method support poll: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
imported>James Green-Armytage
imported>James Green-Armytage
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


'''Which single-winner election methods do you support for the election of government officials?''' Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that you support the method for local, state, and federal elections.
'''Which single-winner election methods do you support for the election of government officials?''' Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that you support the method for local, state, and federal elections.



*James Green-Armytage
*James Green-Armytage
Line 16: Line 17:


Close to opposing: [[Minimax|minmax]], [[MMPO]], [[Bucklin]], [[Descending Acquiescing Coalitions]]
Close to opposing: [[Minimax|minmax]], [[MMPO]], [[Bucklin]], [[Descending Acquiescing Coalitions]]



==Legislative election methods==
==Legislative election methods==


'''Which legislative (multi-winner) election methods do you support for the election of government officials?''' Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that you support the method for local, state, and federal elections.
'''Which legislative (multi-winner) election methods do you support for the election of government officials?''' Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that you support the method for local, state, and federal elections.



*James Green-Armytage
*James Green-Armytage
Line 25: Line 28:


Close to opposing: [[Cumulative voting]], [[limited voting]], [[SNTV]]
Close to opposing: [[Cumulative voting]], [[limited voting]], [[SNTV]]



== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 00:54, 9 September 2005

Method support poll. Anyone with an interest in voting methods is welcome to participate. Do not alter the entries of any other participant. In this context, "supporting" a method means that you would an effort to adopt this method in the place of a method that you don't "support". If you oppose a method, that means that you might attempt to prevent the adoption of that method, even as a replacement for a method not on your "support" list. There is no need to list every method that you oppose; just those that you think are worth mentioning, i.e. at least somewhat controversial. Feel free to rank your supported methods in order of preference, or supply some other kind of comparison between them.


Single winner election methods

Which single-winner election methods do you support for the election of government officials? Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that you support the method for local, state, and federal elections.


  • James Green-Armytage

Support: cardinal pairwise with beatpath, ranked pairs, river, or sequential dropping, AWP, CWO-IRV, ER-IRV(whole), Approval voting, ER-IRV(fractional), IRV

Close to supporting: DMC, CDTT, IRV, Smith//minimax

Oppose: Borda count

Close to opposing: minmax, MMPO, Bucklin, Descending Acquiescing Coalitions


Legislative election methods

Which legislative (multi-winner) election methods do you support for the election of government officials? Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that you support the method for local, state, and federal elections.


  • James Green-Armytage

Support CPO-STV, single transferable vote

Close to opposing: Cumulative voting, limited voting, SNTV


See also