Method support poll: Difference between revisions
imported>KVenzke |
imported>KVenzke |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*James Green-Armytage |
*'''James Green-Armytage''' |
||
Support: [[cardinal pairwise]] with [[beatpath]], [[ranked pairs]], [[river]], or [[sequential dropping]], [[CWP|AWP]], [[Candidate withdrawal option|CWO-IRV]], [[ER-IRV|ER-IRV(whole)]], [[Approval voting]], [[ER-IRV|ER-IRV(fractional)]], [[IRV]] |
Support: [[cardinal pairwise]] with [[beatpath]], [[ranked pairs]], [[river]], or [[sequential dropping]], [[CWP|AWP]], [[Candidate withdrawal option|CWO-IRV]], [[ER-IRV|ER-IRV(whole)]], [[Approval voting]], [[ER-IRV|ER-IRV(fractional)]], [[IRV]] |
||
Close to supporting: [[DMC]], [[CDTT, IRV]], [[Smith//minimax]] |
Close to supporting: [[DMC]], [[CDTT|CDTT, IRV]], [[Smith//minimax]] |
||
Oppose: [[Borda count]] |
Oppose: [[Borda count]] |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Close to opposing: [[Minimax|minmax]], [[MMPO]], [[Bucklin]], [[Descending Acquiescing Coalitions]] |
Close to opposing: [[Minimax|minmax]], [[MMPO]], [[Bucklin]], [[Descending Acquiescing Coalitions]] |
||
*'''Kevin Venzke''' |
|||
Support: [[ICA]], [[Approval voting]] |
|||
Close to supporting: [[Schulze method|Schulze]], Tideman, or River using winning votes or possibly [[cardinal pairwise|approval opposition (i.e. AWP)]], [[ER-Bucklin]](whole), [[MAMPO]] |
|||
Support for legislatures: [[CDTT|CDTT,MMPO]], [[MMPO]] |
|||
Oppose: [[IRV]], margins, [[Borda count|Borda]], [[DSC]] |
|||
==Legislative election methods== |
==Legislative election methods== |
||
Revision as of 15:20, 9 September 2005
Method support poll. Anyone with an interest in voting methods is welcome to participate. Do not alter the entries of any other participant. In this context, "supporting" a method means that you would an effort to adopt this method in the place of a method that you don't "support". If you oppose a method, that means that you might attempt to prevent the adoption of that method, even as a replacement for a method not on your "support" list. There is no need to list every method that you oppose; just those that you think are worth mentioning, i.e. at least somewhat controversial. Feel free to rank your supported methods in order of preference, or supply some other kind of comparison between them.
Single winner election methods
Which single-winner election methods do you support for the election of government officials? Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that you support the method for local, state, and federal elections.
- James Green-Armytage
Support: cardinal pairwise with beatpath, ranked pairs, river, or sequential dropping, AWP, CWO-IRV, ER-IRV(whole), Approval voting, ER-IRV(fractional), IRV
Close to supporting: DMC, CDTT, IRV, Smith//minimax
Oppose: Borda count
Close to opposing: minmax, MMPO, Bucklin, Descending Acquiescing Coalitions
- Kevin Venzke
Support: ICA, Approval voting
Close to supporting: Schulze, Tideman, or River using winning votes or possibly approval opposition (i.e. AWP), ER-Bucklin(whole), MAMPO
Support for legislatures: CDTT,MMPO, MMPO
Oppose: IRV, margins, Borda, DSC
Legislative election methods
Which legislative (multi-winner) election methods do you support for the election of government officials? Unless otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that you support the method for local, state, and federal elections.
- James Green-Armytage
Support CPO-STV, single transferable vote
Close to opposing: Cumulative voting, limited voting, SNTV
- Kevin Venzke
Support open party list (approval component), closed party list, possibly a proportional approval scheme