Minet Ranked-Choice Voting: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
(more details, refs)
(Add categories)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Minet Ranked-Choice Voting''' ('''MRCV''') is a variation of [[Baldwin's method]] proposed by Roy A. Minet, who claims it to be the "best possible ordinal voting method".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://royminet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/OrdinalVotingAnalysis.pdf|title=A Comprehensive, Conclusive Analysis Of Ordinal Voting Methods|last=Minet|first=Roy A.|date=2018|website=RoyMinet.Org|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref>
'''Minet Ranked-Choice Voting''' ('''MRCV''') is a variation of [[Baldwin's method]] proposed by Roy A. Minet, who claims it to be the "best possible ordinal voting method".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://royminet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/OrdinalVotingAnalysis.pdf|title=A Comprehensive, Conclusive Analysis Of Ordinal Voting Methods|last=Minet|first=Roy A.|date=2018|website=RoyMinet.Org|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://royminet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Voting4BetterDecisions.pdf|title=Voting for Better Decisions|last=Minet|first=Roy A.|date=2016|website=RoyMinet.Org|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=}}</ref>


== Definition ==
== Definition ==
Like Baldwin's method, MRCV uses a [[ranked ballot]] (with incomplete ballots allowed), and proceeds in a series of rounds, eliminating the candidate with the least number of points in each round until one gets a majority of first-preference votes.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Baldwin|first=J. M.|date=1926|title=The technique of the Nanson preferential majority system of election|url=https://archive.org/details/proceedingsroyaxxxvroyaa/page/42|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria|volume=39|pages=42–52|via=}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Nanson|first=E. J.|date=1882|title=Methods of election|url=https://archive.org/details/transactionsproc1719roya/page/197|journal=Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria|volume=19|pages=197–240|via=}}</ref>{{Rp|217}}
Like Baldwin's method, MRCV uses a [[ranked ballot]] (with incomplete ballots allowed), and proceeds in a series of rounds, eliminating the candidate with the least number of points in each round until one gets a majority of first-preference votes.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Baldwin|first=J. M.|date=1926|title=The technique of the Nanson preferential majority system of election|url=https://archive.org/details/proceedingsroyaxxxvroyaa/page/42|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria|volume=39|pages=42–52|via=}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Nanson|first=E. J.|date=1882|title=Methods of election|url=https://archive.org/details/transactionsproc1719roya/page/197|journal=Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria|volume=19|pages=197–240|via=}}</ref>{{Rp|217}}


However, in MRCV, voters are limited to only expressing their top three rankings, they cannot express indifference (equal rankings are not allowed), and the points are assigned to rankings non-linearly, with each ranking assumed to have half the cardinal utility of the previous:
However, in MRCV, voters are limited to only expressing their top three rankings, they cannot express indifference (equal rankings are not allowed), and the points are assigned to rankings non-linearly, with each ranking assumed to have half the cardinal utility of the previous (somewhat similar to the [[W:Borda count#Dowdall%20system%20(Nauru)|Dowdall system]]):
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+
|+
Line 23: Line 23:
|1
|1
|}
|}

== See also ==

* [[Best/Alternate/Worst Voting]]
* [[Approve/Approve/Disapprove Voting]]


== References ==
== References ==
<references />
<references />
[[Category:Preferential voting methods]]
[[Category:Ranked voting methods]]
[[Category:Single-winner voting methods]]
[[Category:Single-winner voting methods]]
[[Category:Sequential loser-elimination methods]]

Latest revision as of 23:36, 13 June 2023

Minet Ranked-Choice Voting (MRCV) is a variation of Baldwin's method proposed by Roy A. Minet, who claims it to be the "best possible ordinal voting method".[1][2]

Definition

Like Baldwin's method, MRCV uses a ranked ballot (with incomplete ballots allowed), and proceeds in a series of rounds, eliminating the candidate with the least number of points in each round until one gets a majority of first-preference votes.[3][4]:217

However, in MRCV, voters are limited to only expressing their top three rankings, they cannot express indifference (equal rankings are not allowed), and the points are assigned to rankings non-linearly, with each ranking assumed to have half the cardinal utility of the previous (somewhat similar to the Dowdall system):

Preference Baldwin/Borda MRCV
1 2 4
2 1 2
3 0 1

See also

References

  1. Minet, Roy A. (2018). "A Comprehensive, Conclusive Analysis Of Ordinal Voting Methods" (PDF). RoyMinet.Org.
  2. Minet, Roy A. (2016). "Voting for Better Decisions" (PDF). RoyMinet.Org.
  3. Baldwin, J. M. (1926). "The technique of the Nanson preferential majority system of election". Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 39: 42–52.
  4. Nanson, E. J. (1882). "Methods of election". Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 19: 197–240.