Participation criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (Remove example of IIB-like criterion (see talk page)) |
(→Notes) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||
See [[Truncation]] for a Participation-like criterion for [[bullet voting]]. |
|||
Note that the Participation criterion doesn't say a voter should be able to benefit in some circumstances by voting, nor does it quantify such a thing. For example, a voting method which randomly chooses one of the candidates regardless of the votes would pass Participation, despite not giving voters any power. Voting methods like [[Score]] and [[FPTP]] can have this quantified because they are based on similar systems of increasing a candidate's "quality number", with each voter only being able to increase the number for a given candidate to a certain maximal amount. |
Note that the Participation criterion doesn't say a voter should be able to benefit in some circumstances by voting, nor does it quantify such a thing. For example, a voting method which randomly chooses one of the candidates regardless of the votes would pass Participation, despite not giving voters any power. Voting methods like [[Score]] and [[FPTP]] can have this quantified because they are based on similar systems of increasing a candidate's "quality number", with each voter only being able to increase the number for a given candidate to a certain maximal amount. |
||
Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
*[[Voting system]] |
*[[Voting system]] |
||
*[[Monotonicity criterion]] |
*[[Monotonicity criterion]] |
||
*[[Independence of Irrelevant Ballots]] |
|||
*[[Condorcet Criterion]] |
*[[Condorcet Criterion]] |
||
*[[Generalized Condorcet criterion]] |
*[[Generalized Condorcet criterion]] |
||
Line 51: | Line 54: | ||
*[[Weak Defensive Strategy criterion]] |
*[[Weak Defensive Strategy criterion]] |
||
*[[Favorite Betrayal criterion]] |
*[[Favorite Betrayal criterion]] |
||
* |
|||
*[[Summability criterion]] |
*[[Summability criterion]] |
||