Primary election: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Adding Category:Primary elections and putting this article at the top of the sort order)
(→‎Notes: linking to unified primary on this wiki, and linking to first-past-the-post rather than the "FPTP" abbreviation. Also, attempting to clarify the #Notes section)
Line 22: Line 22:


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
Partisan primary elections tend to result in a [[center squeeze effect]]; a candidate liked by all voters can theoretically be eliminated from contention because more partisan voters prefer candidates closer to their views, to the detriment of more centrist nonpartisan voters who don't vote in primaries. This is a major reason why the "[[W:Unified primary|unified primary]]" ([[Approval voting]] + [[runoff]]) was advocated; it was argued that centrist candidates would have a better chance of avoiding elimination if partisans could support both their favorite candidates and the compromise candidates because of the Approval feature, rather than only choosing one, as in [[FPTP]].
Partisan primary elections tend to result in a [[center squeeze effect]]. A candidate liked by all voters can theoretically be eliminated from contention because more partisan voters prefer candidates closer to their views, to the detriment of more centrist nonpartisan voters who don't vote in primaries. This is a major reason why the "[[unified primary]]" has started finding support. Centrist candidates have a better chance of avoiding elimination under unified primaries than other methods, since partisans could support both their favorite candidates and the compromise candidates, rather than only choosing one (as required in [[first-past-the-post]] and typical [[Blanket primary|blanket primaries]]).


[[Category:Voting theory]]
[[Category:Voting theory]]