Schulze method: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Schulze method (view source)

Revision as of 14:36, 14 July 2023

339 bytes added , 10 months ago

m

Added clone independent category

VisualWikitext

Kristomun

1,196

edits

Revision as of 23:21, 4 June 2020 (view source) RobLa (talk \| contribs) (→‎Discussions: adding EndFPTP discussion that started earlier today) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 14:36, 14 July 2023 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) m (Added clone independent category)
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 656: # [[Summability criterion]] # [[Strategic nomination\|Independence of clones]] # [[~~Neutrality~~Blank ofBallot ~~Spoiled Ballots~~Criterion]] #[[Independence of Smith-dominated Alternatives]] Line 899: <!-- this section contains a lot of links; please try to keep it organized by the author's last name. --> * [http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/vm/survey.htm#beatpath Voting Methods Survey] by James Green-Armytage * [https://www.~~cse~~cs.~~wustl~~angelo.edu/~~~legrand~~rlegrand/rbvote/desc.html Descriptions of ranked-ballot voting methods] by Rob LeGrand * [http://accuratedemocracy.com/voting_rules.htm Accurate Democracy] by Rob Loring * [http://rangevoting.org/SchulzeExplan.html Schulze beatpaths method] by Warren D. Smith Line 905: * [http://seehuhn.de/comp/vote.html The Debian Voting System] by Jochen Voss * [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/ election-methods: a mailing list containing technical discussions about election methods] * [https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/15637/why-is-schulze-the-most-popular-condorcet-election-method "Why is Schulze the most popular Condorcet election method?"] ''[[politics.stackexchange.com]]'' 2017-02-14 === Research papers === Line 958 ⟶ 959: [[Category:Smith-efficient Condorcet methods]] [[Category:Defeat-dropping Condorcet methods]] [[Category:Monotonic_electoral_systems]] [[Category:Ranked voting methods]] [[Category:Clone-independent electoral systems]]