Display title | Sequential Asset Voting |
Default sort key | Sequential Asset Voting |
Page length (in bytes) | 4,424 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 1476 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page views in the past month | 0 |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 00:14, 17 December 2019 |
Latest editor | Psephomancy (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 15:23, 19 February 2020 |
Total number of edits | 3 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Sequential Asset Voting is a tweak to Asset Voting that can be done several ways. One is by doing Asset sequentially in the multiwinner case: multiple rounds of negotiations are done, and after each round, the candidate(s) with the most votes are elected. It is also possible to spend or exhaust some votes after each seat is elected in Sequential Asset, which can influence the negotiation and potentially make Sequential Asset move in a continuum between majoritarianism and proportionality. If a Droop quota of votes is spent each time, for example, then Sequential Asset becomes at least semi-proportional based on negotiator preferences. |