Single distributed vote: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
This system is very similar to Reweighted Range Voting. The logic for the theoretical motivation is laid out above. While the concept of an underlying conserved ballot might be compelling theoretically it is worth considering the practical differences. While results are similar in most situation it is worth noting that [[Single distributed vote]] down-weights vote power the same or more than [[Reweighted Range Voting]]. |
This system is very similar to Reweighted Range Voting. The logic for the theoretical motivation is laid out above. While the concept of an underlying conserved ballot might be compelling theoretically it is worth considering the practical differences. While results are similar in most situation it is worth noting that [[Single distributed vote]] down-weights vote power the same or more than [[Reweighted Range Voting]]. |
||
One clear benefit is that [[Single distributed vote]] |
One clear benefit is that [[Single distributed vote]] fulfills [[Scale invariance]] while [[Reweighted Range Voting]] does not. The [[Kotze-Pereira transformation]] can be used to add [[Scale invariance]] to [[Reweighted Range Voting]] but it is an added complication to the system. The details can be seen on the page [[Kotze-Pereira_transformation#Scale_Invariance_example_for_RRV | here]]. |
||
==References== |
==References== |