Jump to content

Wasted votes: Difference between revisions

m
grammar/spelling
m (replaced extension term with generalization)
m (grammar/spelling)
Line 6:
Next, since in order to win an election the winner need only have more votes then their opponent (and as FPTP elections are winner take all, they cannot win extra seats for beating their opponent by a large margin) the number of votes cast for the winning candidate above the threshold of votes needed to surpass the candidate with the 2nd most votes are also considered wasted.
 
FinnallyFinally, in an uncontested election where there is only one candidate, that threasholdthreshold becomes 1 since as long as at-least one person votes for the single candidate, it does not matter how many votes they receive in order to win the election as long as they get at-least 1 vote.
 
== 1st generalization: Calculating the number of wasted votes under other voting methods that pass the participation criterion ==
Line 15:
When this mathematical definition of the number of wasted votes in an election is applied to FPTP, it produces the same count for the number of wasted votes the procedure above produces.
 
However this definition does have it's limitations: in voting methods that do not pass the participation criterion, such participation failures can drastically deflate the tally of the number of wasted votes. Example: consider the fallowing voting method: voters cast single preference votes and if there are an odd number of votes cast, the candidate with the most votes wins, otherwise the candidate with the 2nd most votes wins. Under this definition of wasted votes, there are no wasted votes under this method because every vote changes the winner. However not every vote changes the winner in a way that benefits the voter who castedcast it, and if a voter casts a vote that worsens the election result from their perspective, then they might as well not even cast that vote to begin with.
 
== 2nd generalization: Calculating the number of wasted votes under other voting methods that pass the participation criterion ==
Line 24:
Note that for methods that allow voters to omit preferences between candidates, calculating this metric exactly (footnote 2) requires knowing not just all of the votes used in the election to calculate, but also the preferences of all of the voters casting those votes. This means that this metric is no-longer defined by just the raw votes, as under such methods, multiple elections in which the exact same votes are cast can have different numbers of wasted votes depending on the voters casting those votes.
 
== FootenotesFootnotes ==
Footnote 1: An election result in which 2 possible election outcomes are tied is a different election result then one in which there is only one winning election outcome (one winning candidate in a single winner election).
 
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.