Talk:Pairwise counting: Difference between revisions
→Ways of speeding up pairwise counting
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 117:
::: Yes, that's true. I simply meant to show that you don't get quite as much for free as it might seem like you're getting, particularly if the counts are computerized, because you have to add some numbers to correct the non-marked candidate counts at some point, however you do the precinct counts. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 12:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
:::: I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "correcting the non-marked candidate counts". But if you understand that this post-processing stage requires maybe a couple of minutes of work at most for regular elections, then that's good; I just wanted to clarify that the math can be done in 2 seconds by a computer (Excel spreadsheet with the value for number of voters ranking a candidate added to all other values in that row, which will be the number of voters ranking that candidate below another candidate in a head-to-head matchup) whereas the tallying in the precincts could take days, so it's not as big a caveat as the wording of the sentence might suggest. [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy|BetterVotingAdvocacy]] ([[User talk:BetterVotingAdvocacy|talk]]) 21:55, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
| |||