Talk:Approval scored voting: Difference between revisions
→IRV-WVER
(→IRV-WVER: - is ApSV actually "instant-runoff voting (IRV) with whole-votes equal-ranking (WVER)"?) |
|||
Line 13:
[[User:Acadia]] hasn't called this "Adadia's method" (which I'm grateful for), but based on what [[User:MarkusSchulze]] is saying, and what [[User:BetterVotingAdvocacy]] is linking to, it would appear that this is actually a variant of [[IRV]]. I haven't had a chance to do a deep read of this article, so I can't say for sure. My conversation with [[User:Acadia]] on the [[C4ES Discord server]], we may want to spend some part of this article talking about the similarities and differences. Moreover, it would seem that we need to have a better "Discussion" section on this article, and perhaps we even need to consider whether this article is ready for the main namepsace yet. Thoughts? -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 01:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
:I say while similar it is not the same as I've pointed out before it uses a scored ballot with the point of creating a more accurate view of politicians for the fact that with a scored ballot voters do not focus on prefferences (which normal IRV encourages) but instead asks to show how much you approve of each candidate which then allows you prefferences show naturally. Also the multi seat allocation part of it cannot be forgotten as I personally am opposed to single seat elections outside of offices that can only be filled by one person (ex: a prime minister of president), the fact of the matter is that irv-wver is supposed to be a fix for wrongly filled out irv ballots and ApSV is ment to be Its own stand-alone system with a different style of ballot, a different multi winner system, and a way to translate approval to prefferences as to provide a better view of a person's beleifs. [[User:Acadia|Acadia]] ([[User talk:Acadia|talk]]) 01:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
| |||