Evaluative Proportional Representation: Difference between revisions

Evaluative Proportional Representation (view source)

318 bytes added , 3 years ago

m

Clarify that this is a weighted PR method (like Chamberlin-Courant; unlike Monroe).

1,221

edits

Revision as of 00:21, 20 March 2020 (view source) Psephomancy (talk \| contribs) (add References section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:33, 5 September 2020 (view source) Kristomun (talk \| contribs) m (Clarify that this is a weighted PR method (like Chamberlin-Courant; unlike Monroe).) Newer edit →
Line 1: '''Evaluative Proportional Representation''' ('''EPR''') is ~~the~~a proportional extension of [[Majority Judgment]]. It is highly related to the [[Expanding Approvals Rule]].<ref>https://www.jpolrisk.com/legislatures-elected-by-evaluative-proportional-representation-epr-an-algorithm-v2/</ref> Unlike EAR, it doesn't aim to ensure proportionality by seat count. Instead, EPR outputs a set of winners along with the weight that each winner should have in a collective decision process (e.g. in a council or by parliamentary procedure). == References == <references/> [[Category:Multi-winner voting methods]] [[Category:Ranked voting methods]]