Jump to content

Majority Choice Approval: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
imported>Homunq
No edit summary
Line 89:
Thus, overall, many elections should be resolved without need for a resolution method, and so all MCA methods should give broadly similar results. However, if resolution is needed, a lack of majorities is, overall, more likely than multiple majorities. Since the design intent is to minimize these situations, the resolution method chosen should be one which tends to encourage extending approvals; that is, one which comes "close" to fulfilling the [[Later-no-harm criterion]], so that extending approval is unlikely to harm one's favorite candidate. From simple to complex, such methods are: MCA-S, MCA-IR, and MCA-AR.
 
[[Category:Single-winner voting systemsmethods]]
[[Category:Graded Bucklin systemsmethods]]
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.