Majority score voting: Difference between revisions
Category:Graded Bucklin systems → Category:Graded Bucklin methods
imported>Homunq |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 26:
* It fails the [[participation criterion]] but passes the [[semi-honest participation criterion]].
* It fails the [[Strategy-free criterion]], but, as shown in the center squeeze
It fails the [[consistency criterion]], the [[Condorcet loser criterion]], [[reversibility]], the [[majority loser criterion]], and the [[later-no-harm criterion]].
Line 128:
As discussed in the above section, if all the candidates in the first round got a majority "reject", then the voters have sent a message that none of the candidates are good, akin to a result of "[[none of the above]]" (NOTA). Majority score still gives a winner, but it might be good to have a rule to limit the chance that such a winner would remain in office for multiple terms. This could either be a hard term limit, so that such a winner could only legally serve one term; or perhaps a softer rule that if they run for the same office again, the information of what percent of voters had rejected them should be next to their name on the ballot.
[[Category:Graded Bucklin
|