Jump to content

Summability criterion: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(Add party list PR to k=1, remove Iterative Ranked AV (as we have no article or source for it))
mNo edit summary
Line 18:
 
In many [[Condorcet method]]s, each ballot can be represented as a two-dimensional square array referred to as a pairwise matrix. The sum of these matrices may be reported from each precinct.
 
[[Category:Voting system criteria]]
 
== Requirements ==
Line 72 ⟶ 70:
 
====== Median methods ======
Alternatively, precincts may sum up the number of times each candidate was ranked at each of the <math>c</math> possible ranks (or grades). This ''positional matrix'' can then be used to compute the result for any weighted positional method after the fact, or for median-based methods like [[:Category:Graded Bucklin methods|Category:Gradedgraded Bucklin methods]]. This shows a contrast between median methods and point-scoring methods, where the grade level doesn't matter, only the strength/quality/degree of the grade (i.e. in points-scoring methods, two 1/5s are equivalent to one 2/5).
 
===== Cardinal methods =====
1,221

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.