Anonymous user
Method support poll: Difference between revisions
make formatting more compact
No edit summary |
(make formatting more compact) |
||
Line 10:
*'''James Green-Armytage'''
'''Support:''' [[cardinal pairwise]] with [[beatpath]], [[ranked pairs]],
[[river]], or [[sequential dropping]], [[CWP|AWP]], [[Candidate withdrawal option|CWO-IRV]],
[[ER-IRV|ER-IRV(whole)]], [[Approval voting]], [[ER-IRV|ER-IRV(fractional)]], [[IRV]]
'''Close to supporting:''' [[DMC]], [[CDTT|CDTT, IRV]], [[Smith//minimax]]
'''Oppose:''' [[Borda count]]
'''Close to opposing:''' [[Minimax|minmax]], [[MMPO]], [[Bucklin]], [[Descending Acquiescing Coalitions]]▼
▲Close to opposing: [[Minimax|minmax]], [[MMPO]], [[Bucklin]], [[Descending Acquiescing Coalitions]]
*'''Kevin Venzke'''
''In general I prefer methods without [[favorite betrayal]] incentive. I
insist on [[Minimal Defense criterion|minimal defense]] or something similar.''
'''Support:''' [[ICA]], [[Approval voting]]
'''Close to supporting:''' [[Schulze method|Schulze]], Tideman, or River (using winning votes
'''Support for legislatures only:''' [[CDTT]]-[[Later-no-harm criterion|Later-no-harm]] combination methods▼
'''Oppose:''' [[plurality voting|plurality]], [[IRV]], [[ER-IRV]], margins, [[Borda count|Borda]],
▲Support for legislatures only: [[CDTT]]-[[Later-no-harm criterion|Later-no-harm]] combination methods
[[DSC]], rating ballots
▲Oppose: [[plurality voting|plurality]], [[IRV]], [[ER-IRV]], margins, [[Borda count|Borda]], [[DSC]], rating ballots
*'''Juho Laatu'''
'''Support:'''
maybe not that bad
*Pairwise comparison methods enhanced with additional approval or rating information: ok as well if not too complex for the voters▼
improvements/changes (that are not all positive)
*[[Approval voting|Approval]]: clean method and at least some improvement to the commonly user methods▼
▲
*Best [[IRV]] methods (if pairwise comparison based methods are out of question)▼
not too complex for the voters
▲
Close to supporting: [[Runoff voting|Two round system]] (not that bad for multiparty countries)▼
methods
Not supporting: Rating based methods (maybe not feasible for contentious elections like the government official elections of this query, but good for non-contentious elections)▼
▲ '''Close to supporting:''' [[Runoff voting|Two round system]] (not that bad for multiparty countries)
▲ '''Not supporting:''' Rating based methods (maybe not feasible for contentious elections like the
Oppose:▼
government official elections of this query, but good for non-contentious elections)
*[[plurality voting|Plurality]] (except that it is ok for two party countries IF they want to stay that way)▼
▲ '''Oppose:'''
*Regional winner gets all votes of that region▼
▲
*[[Borda count|Borda]] and many other ("more heuristic") methods▼
that way)
==Legislative election methods==
Line 53 ⟶ 54:
*'''James Green-Armytage'''
'''Support:''' [[CPO-STV]], [[single transferable vote]]
'''Close to opposing:''' [[Cumulative voting]], [[limited voting]], [[SNTV]]▼
▲Close to opposing: [[Cumulative voting]], [[limited voting]], [[SNTV]]
*'''Kevin Venzke'''
'''Support:''' open party list (approval component), closed party list,
possibly a proportional approval scheme
*'''Juho Laatu'''
'''Support:'''
'''Close to supporting:''' [[Closed list|Closed party list]], [[CPO-STV]] (complexity problems)▼
'''Not supporting:''' Two party methods (ok if kept intentionally, not just because of fear of
▲Close to supporting: [[Closed list|Closed party list]], [[CPO-STV]] (complexity problems)
changes or to stay in power)
▲Not supporting: Two party methods (ok if kept intentionally, not just because of fear of changes or to stay in power)
== See also ==
| |||