Jump to content

User:Araucaria: Difference between revisions

Fixing links, clarifying random choice idea
imported>Araucaria
(It's been 3 years already, time for an update.)
imported>Araucaria
(Fixing links, clarifying random choice idea)
Line 5:
* Favorite plus [[Range Voting]]. Single Favorite as above, plus a score of 0 to 99 can be given to any number of other candidates. Same fallback as above, except total range score is used instead of approval.
 
Once a [[Range Ballot]] begins to be used, the scores could be tabulated and reported in several different formats for comparison. ItIn mightorder evento beavoid ofstrategic benefitvoting, toone randomlycould introduce unpredictability by choosechoosing the winner betweenrandomly theby [[Range Voting winnervoting]], [[Schulze]], [[Definite Majority Choice]], andor [[Cardinal Pairwisepairwise]] using [[River]]. Since all four methods have similar sincere voting strategies but different "gaming"strategies methodsin the case of cycles, it would encourage voters to simply vote by preference instead of trying to work aroundgame the system.
 
You can contact me at ''araucaria dot araucana at gmail dot com''.
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.