Proportionality for Solid Coalitions: Difference between revisions
Proportionality for Solid Coalitions (view source)
Revision as of 16:47, 19 February 2020
, 4 years agono edit summary
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (ref formatting with Citer) |
Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 130:
Arguably there is some kind of coalition of 45 voters backing candidates A through J here, and since the largest opposing coalition is 8 voters, D'Hondt would say that the 45-voter coalition ought to win all 5 seats. At that point, one could eliminate all candidates outside the 45-voter coalition (K and L) at which point A through E all are a Hare quota's 1st choice and must all win. This sort of thinking is generally what Condorcet PR methods such as Schulze STV do.
== See Also ==
* [[Proportional representation]]
* [[Justified representation]]
* [[Stable Winner Set]]
* [[Types of representation]]
== References ==
|