Talk:Center squeeze: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
: I don't think there's a formalized "center squeeze criterion". But as an indication, you could try to see if your IRV version elects Center in every configuration of the [[Left, Center, Right]] scenario; that is, all possible elections with x < 50%, y < 50%, x + y > 50%, where x, y, z are defined as on that page. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 14:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC) |
: I don't think there's a formalized "center squeeze criterion". But as an indication, you could try to see if your IRV version elects Center in every configuration of the [[Left, Center, Right]] scenario; that is, all possible elections with x < 50%, y < 50%, x + y > 50%, where x, y, z are defined as on that page. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 14:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
: Presumably, Center should also be elected if any of the candidates is cloned. This could exclude methods that check a fixed number of candidates to otherwise obtain Condorcet compliance, but it would also be more difficult to test. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 14:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC) |
: Presumably, Center should also be elected if any of the candidates is cloned in a way that does not introduce a Condorcet cycle among the cloned candidates. This could exclude methods that check a fixed number of candidates to otherwise obtain Condorcet compliance, but it would also be more difficult to test. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 14:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC) |