Talk:First Past the Post electoral system: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (reply to user:RobLa) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: I agree with deleting this sort of duplicated content (as long as we check and make sure that each paragraphs/concepts really are duplicated in both places). — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 15:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC) |
: I agree with deleting this sort of duplicated content (as long as we check and make sure that each paragraphs/concepts really are duplicated in both places). — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 15:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Ranked ballots == |
|||
"FPTP can be done either with a [[choose-one ballot]], or with a [[ranked ballot]] (by only looking at a voter's 1st choice candidate" |
|||
There is no reason to ever do this, so why mention it? — [[User:Psephomancy|Psephomancy]] ([[User talk:Psephomancy|talk]]) 16:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:32, 12 April 2020
Possible norm for Wikipedia content on Electowiki
I nuked a large chunk of content, since I don't think it's valuable for us to spend a lot of time copyediting articles that were copied from Wikipedia to Electowiki back in 2005 or 2006. When there's already a sufficient article over on Wikipedia, we should just link to it summary style. I may note this later over on Electowiki:The caucus or on Electowiki:Policy -- RobLa (talk) 04:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with deleting this sort of duplicated content (as long as we check and make sure that each paragraphs/concepts really are duplicated in both places). — Psephomancy (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Ranked ballots
"FPTP can be done either with a choose-one ballot, or with a ranked ballot (by only looking at a voter's 1st choice candidate"
There is no reason to ever do this, so why mention it? — Psephomancy (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)