Talk:Independence of the least/most preferred: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→mono-add-top and mono-remove-bottom: new section) |
(→About the implication to min-max: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"Independence of the most preferred" sounds like mono-add-top. "Independence of the least preferred" sounds like mono-remove-bottom. [[User:MarkusSchulze|MarkusSchulze]] ([[User talk:MarkusSchulze|talk]]) 19:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
"Independence of the most preferred" sounds like mono-add-top. "Independence of the least preferred" sounds like mono-remove-bottom. [[User:MarkusSchulze|MarkusSchulze]] ([[User talk:MarkusSchulze|talk]]) 19:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
== About the implication to min-max == |
|||
I don't think that the implication ''Meeting these criterion favors the use of intermediate ratings (if present in the voting system), reducing strategies such as min-maxing'' follows. Range meets both criteria yet the optimal strategy is to min-max. [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 10:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 10:27, 28 September 2020
mono-add-top and mono-remove-bottom
"Independence of the most preferred" sounds like mono-add-top. "Independence of the least preferred" sounds like mono-remove-bottom. MarkusSchulze (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
About the implication to min-max
I don't think that the implication Meeting these criterion favors the use of intermediate ratings (if present in the voting system), reducing strategies such as min-maxing follows. Range meets both criteria yet the optimal strategy is to min-max. Kristomun (talk) 10:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)