Talk:Instant-runoff voting: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
== Variants: ways of dealing with equal rankings (see STV page) == |
== Variants: ways of dealing with equal rankings (see STV page) == |
||
For discussion, I offer this alternative. The |
For discussion, I offer this alternative. The given example shows how my improvement of IRV deals with equal rankings using [[Random Voter Hierarchy]] (RVH) which is described on the IRV page as "Randomly determine a strict ordering of the candidates and when selecting a candidate to eliminate, pick one based on this strict ordering". I would also apply this ordering in dealing with equal rankings and cyclical ties. |
||
⚫ | |||
The result changes as C reaches the border of a majority, going from a three way cyclical tie to a win by C. |
|||
15 A>C>B |
|||
⚫ | |||
35 B>A>C |
35 B>A>C |
||
Line 215: | Line 209: | ||
20 C>B>A |
20 C>B>A |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
In the other example given on “Ways to deal with equal ranking” |
In the other example given on “Ways to deal with equal ranking” |
||
34 A=B=C |
34 A=B=C |
||
Line 230: | Line 219: | ||
33 E |
33 E |
||
The winner is whichever of A, B or C claims the best ranking in the RVH. |
The winner is whichever of A, B or C claims the best ranking in the RVH. |