4,193
edits
Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
→Ranked systems are not necessarily proportional: - thanks for tue suggestion, User:PerfectlyGoodInk! I reorganized Main Page (and hopefully addressed your concern).
(Added recommendation to move ranked system out of Proportional Representation bullet.) |
(→Ranked systems are not necessarily proportional: - thanks for tue suggestion, User:PerfectlyGoodInk! I reorganized Main Page (and hopefully addressed your concern).) |
||
Line 8:
== Ranked systems are not necessarily proportional ==
Under movements, I think ranking systems should be moved out of the Proportional representation bullet. IRV/RCV is a winner-take-all method and is what most people think of when they think of ranked ballots. Also, the most common uses of ProRep around the world today use list systems that do not have a ranked ballot. - [[User:PerfectlyGoodInk|PerfectlyGoodInk]] ([[User talk:PerfectlyGoodInk|talk]]) 18:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
:Yeah, you're right, [[User:PerfectlyGoodInk|PerfectlyGoodInk]]. I modified the page to separate the single-winner systems (currently at "[[Single-member district]]") and [[multi-member system]]s. Thanks for the suggestion! -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 04:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
| |||