Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Add suggestion for bullets under multi-member systems.
(→Ranked systems are not necessarily proportional: - thanks for tue suggestion, User:PerfectlyGoodInk! I reorganized Main Page (and hopefully addressed your concern).) |
(Add suggestion for bullets under multi-member systems.) |
||
Line 9:
Under movements, I think ranking systems should be moved out of the Proportional representation bullet. IRV/RCV is a winner-take-all method and is what most people think of when they think of ranked ballots. Also, the most common uses of ProRep around the world today use list systems that do not have a ranked ballot. - [[User:PerfectlyGoodInk|PerfectlyGoodInk]] ([[User talk:PerfectlyGoodInk|talk]]) 18:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
:Yeah, you're right, [[User:PerfectlyGoodInk|PerfectlyGoodInk]]. I modified the page to separate the single-winner systems (currently at "[[Single-member district]]") and [[multi-member system]]s. Thanks for the suggestion! -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 04:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
:Thanks! Would also suggest adding 3 bullets under multi-member systems for [[Party-list proportional representation|party-list]], [[Mixed-member proportional|MMP]], and [[Single transferable vote|STV]]. Much appreciated! [[User:PerfectlyGoodInk|PerfectlyGoodInk]] ([[User talk:PerfectlyGoodInk|talk]]) 18:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
| |||