| Display title | Talk:Method evaluation poll 2005 |
| Default sort key | Method evaluation poll 2005 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 3,007 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 530 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>KVenzke |
| Date of page creation | 00:22, 16 June 2005 |
| Latest editor | Psephomancy (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 04:19, 12 February 2019 |
| Total number of edits | 13 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I put Condorcet//Approval with FBC patch under "ranked" methods rather than "cutoff" methods since I don't advise that one be allowed to rank among disapproved candidates in this method. That way, there is no burial incentive. Kevin Venzke |
