| Display title | Talk:Minimal Defense criterion |
| Default sort key | Minimal Defense criterion |
| Page length (in bytes) | 804 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 532 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>SEppley |
| Date of page creation | 23:48, 22 November 2012 |
| Latest editor | Closed Limelike Curves (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 19:32, 18 March 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 2 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The article erroneously claims compliance with Minimal Defense requires voting methods to permit voters to truncate their rankings. There is an alternative: permit voters to express indifference (at least at the bottom of their ranking). In other words, a voter may rank multiple candidates as equal to each other. For example, B > A=C. (Note: I'm not advocating that indifference be permitted ONLY at the bottom. I don't yet have an opinion either way.) SEppley 15:48, 22 November 2012 (PST) |
