| Display title | Talk:Score voting |
| Default sort key | Score voting |
| Page length (in bytes) | 10,939 |
| Namespace ID | 1 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 544 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>James Green-Armytage |
| Date of page creation | 11:40, 19 May 2005 |
| Latest editor | Dr. Edmonds (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 21:48, 24 May 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 17 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Hi there. I hope that I won't offend anyone by this move. I just don't think that it makes any sense to call this method "cardinal ratings". My main reason is that "cardinal ratings" describes a ballot type rather than a tally method. A secondary reason is that the term "cardinal ratings" is somewhat redundant in itself. |
