Talk:Smith criterion: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Smith efficient: should we have a "Smith efficient" redirect to this article (p.s. I gave the prior discussion a "2020-02-22" section header)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9:
Is "Smith efficient" the term of art that y'all use when you're talking about methods in academic settings? It seems like we should at least have a [[Smith efficient]] redirect point to this article, since that seems like an efficient way of referring to this criterion (so to speak). -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 17:37, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
: It seems to be a somewhat frequent term on EM. See, for instance, this post: [http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com//2005-March/080430.html] [[User:Kristomun|Kristomun]] ([[User talk:Kristomun|talk]]) 18:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
| |||