Talk:Threshold Equal Approval: Difference between revisions
m
response
(→Is "Threshold Equal Approval" discussed online?: Please provide a link to discussion about "Threshold Equal Approval", and please fill in "User:Catulhu". Thanks in advance!) |
m (response) |
||
Line 4:
Hi [[User:Catulhu]], has "Threshold Equal Approval" been discussed in any publicly-accessible online forum ? If so, could you provide a deep link to the exact discussion? Otherwise, we'll need to move the "[[Threshold Equal Approval]]" to "[[User:Catulhu/Threshold Equal Approval]]". Also, it's pretty clear you haven't read [[User:RobLa/Welcome]], which isn't required for all editors, but as of this writing, [[User talk:Catulhu|you haven't acknowledged my welcome message from February 2022]]. That's a hint that you aren't inclined reply to talk pages generally, which is worrisome. If nothing else, I would appreciate it if you placed ''something'' on the "[[User:Catulhu]]" page. Thanks in advance! -- [[User:RobLa|RobLa]] ([[User talk:RobLa|talk]]) 05:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
<blockquote>Hi Rob, sorry for not responding to the welcome message!
It's discussed for a bit on this forum post https://www.votingtheory.org/forum/topic/240/threshold-mes/20. Also due to its similarity with Expanding Approvals and ordinal MES, I should link their papers as well, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00355-019-01208-3, and https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/69f8ea31de0c00502b2ae571fbab1f95-Abstract.html respectively. If you'd like me to move it to my user page, I can certainly do that and I don't really mind doing so; I mostly just wanted to have a static description of the method & motivation to point to. I will say though, it seems at least as legitimate as a few other methods with their own pages ;) [[User:Catulhu|Catulhu]] ([[User talk:Catulhu|talk]]) 12:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)</blockquote>
| |||