Template:Infobox voting method: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
(trying to integrate as label)
(two parameter names converted to normal format, title moved to top)
Line 12: Line 12:
"Majority criterion": {
"Majority criterion": {
"description": "Does a candidate that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",
"description": "Does a candidate that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",
"type": "boolean"
},
"Mutual majority criterion": {
"description": "Does someone from a set of candidates that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",
"example": "If a majority of voters are split between several flavors of chocolate ice cream, but agree that any flavor of chocolate is better than any other flavor, then one of the chocolate-type flavors must win.",
"type": "boolean"
"type": "boolean"
},
},
Line 56: Line 51:
"description": "The name of the voting method",
"description": "The name of the voting method",
"required": true
"required": true
},
"mutual-majority": {
"label": "Mutual majority criterion",
"description": "Does someone from a set of candidates that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",
"example": "If a majority of voters are split between several flavors of chocolate ice cream, but agree that any flavor of chocolate is better than any other flavor, then one of the chocolate-type flavors must win.",
"type": "boolean"
}
}
},
},
"description": "An infobox for voting methods",
"description": "An infobox for voting methods",
"paramOrder": [
"paramOrder": [
"title",
"Utility criterion",
"Utility criterion",
"Majority criterion",
"Majority criterion",
"Mutual majority criterion",
"mutual-majority",
"condorcet",
"condorcet",
"Smith criterion",
"Smith criterion",
Line 69: Line 71:
"Favorite Betrayal criterion",
"Favorite Betrayal criterion",
"Single-winner reduction",
"Single-winner reduction",
"Party list case",
"Party list case"
"title"
]
]
}
}

Revision as of 03:39, 31 March 2020

Condorcet compliantNo

An infobox for voting methods

Template parameters[Edit template data]

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
titletitle

The name of the voting method

Unknownrequired
Utility criterionUtility criterion

Does the candidate with the greatest utility always win?

Booleanoptional
Majority criterionMajority criterion

Does a candidate that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?

Booleanoptional
Mutual majority criterionmutual-majority

Does someone from a set of candidates that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?

Example
If a majority of voters are split between several flavors of chocolate ice cream, but agree that any flavor of chocolate is better than any other flavor, then one of the chocolate-type flavors must win.
Booleanoptional
Condorcet criterioncondorcet

Does the Condorcet winner always win when they exist?

Booleanoptional
Smith criterionSmith criterion

Does a candidate from the Smith set always win?

Booleanoptional
Independence of Smith-dominated Alternatives criterionIndependence of Smith-dominated Alternatives criterion

Does the same candidate always win when candidates not in the Smith set are added or removed from the election?

Booleanoptional
Later-no-harm criterionLater-no-harm criterion

Can a voter hurt one of their more-preferred candidates' chances of winning by indicating a preference for a less-preferred candidate?

Booleanoptional
Favorite Betrayal criterionFavorite Betrayal criterion

Do voters ever have strategic incentive to indicate they prefer someone who isn't their honest favorite more than their honest favorite?

Booleanoptional
Single-winner reductionSingle-winner reduction

Which single-winner voting method does this voting method reduce to (become equivalent to) in the single-winner case?

Example
STV becomes IRV in the single-winner case.
Page nameoptional
Party list caseParty list case

Which proportional allocation method does this voting method become equivalent to when voters vote on party lines?

Page nameoptional