Template:Infobox voting method: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(add visible field for Mutual majority)
(change parameter format and example of positive and negative automatic categories)
Line 10: Line 10:
| Yes
| Yes
| No
| No
}}
| label2 = Favorite betrayal compliant
| data2 = {{#if: {{{favorite-betrayal|}}}
| Yes [[Category:Favorite betrayal criterion]]
| No [[Category:Fails favorite betrayal criterion]]
}}
}}
}}<noinclude>
}}<noinclude>
Line 33: Line 38:
"Independence of Smith-dominated Alternatives criterion": {
"Independence of Smith-dominated Alternatives criterion": {
"description": "Does the same candidate always win when candidates not in the Smith set are added or removed from the election?",
"description": "Does the same candidate always win when candidates not in the Smith set are added or removed from the election?",
"type": "boolean"
},
"Favorite Betrayal criterion": {
"description": "Do voters ever have strategic incentive to indicate they prefer someone who isn't their honest favorite more than their honest favorite?",
"type": "boolean"
"type": "boolean"
},
},
Line 61: Line 62:
"description": "Does someone from a set of candidates that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",
"description": "Does someone from a set of candidates that a majority of voters prefer over all others always win?",
"example": "If a majority of voters are split between several flavors of chocolate ice cream, but agree that any flavor of chocolate is better than any other flavor, then one of the chocolate-type flavors must win.",
"example": "If a majority of voters are split between several flavors of chocolate ice cream, but agree that any flavor of chocolate is better than any other flavor, then one of the chocolate-type flavors must win.",
"type": "boolean"
},
"favorite-betrayal": {
"label": "Favorite Betrayal criterion",
"description": "Do voters ever have strategic incentive to indicate they prefer someone who isn't their honest favorite more than their honest favorite?",
"type": "boolean"
"type": "boolean"
}
}
Line 74: Line 80:
"Independence of Smith-dominated Alternatives criterion",
"Independence of Smith-dominated Alternatives criterion",
"Later-no-harm criterion",
"Later-no-harm criterion",
"favorite-betrayal",
"Favorite Betrayal criterion",
"Single-winner reduction",
"Single-winner reduction",
"Party list case"
"Party list case"