Tragni's method: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Aldo Tragni (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 327: | Line 327: | ||
'''[[Consistency criterion|Consistency]]''': if the two separate elections give the same winner, then the union of the two electorates will give the same winner (meets the criterion). |
'''[[Consistency criterion|Consistency]]''': if the two separate elections give the same winner, then the union of the two electorates will give the same winner (meets the criterion). |
||
If in one of the two elections X is in tie with other candidates, while in the other X wins, then it's not said that with the union of the electorates X wins ( |
If in one of the two elections X is in tie with other candidates, while in the other X wins, then it's not said that with the union of the electorates X wins (it depends on what procedures are used to manage tie). |
||
'''[[Reversal symmetry]]''': if the candidates were rated only with [worst] and [best] (which are then reversed), then this criterion is met. If the candidates are rated even with the cardinal scores in [1,5] then the vote cannot be completely reversed, and the criterion isn't applicable. When it's applicable, it's always satisfied. |
'''[[Reversal symmetry]]''': if the candidates were rated only with [worst] and [best] (which are then reversed), then this criterion is met. If the candidates are rated even with the cardinal scores in [1,5] then the vote cannot be completely reversed, and the criterion isn't applicable. When it's applicable, it's always satisfied. |
||