User:AmericaRepair/Favorite / Approval Grading (A / B): Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (Top 4 or 5 primary. And spacing.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
An Approval method that requires finalists to be the favorite of a significant number of voters. |
An Approval method that requires finalists to be the favorite of a significant number of voters. |
||
Simpler than Ranked Choice, more complex than [[Approval voting|Approval Voting]], and likely superior to both, state legislatures will be more likely to go for this one. |
Simpler than Ranked Choice, more complex than [[Approval voting|Approval Voting]], and likely superior to both, state legislatures will be more likely to go for this one. |
||
| Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
A and B grades are added together to determine the total Approval vote. |
A and B grades are added together to determine the total Approval vote. |
||
| Line 35: | Line 32: | ||
Use a simple [[Vote-for-2|Vote-for-2]] nonpartisan primary to qualify four or five, with a Favorite / Approval general election. (Vote-for-2 is a compromise of Favorite and Approval.) |
Use a simple [[Vote-for-2|Vote-for-2]] nonpartisan primary to qualify four or five, with a Favorite / Approval general election. (Vote-for-2 is a compromise of Favorite and Approval.) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 39: | ||
'''Favorite / Approval Grading (A / B / C)''' |
'''Favorite / Approval Grading (A / B / C)''' |
||
| Line 83: | Line 78: | ||
These aspects of Instant Runoff cause an occasional, but inevitable error: |
These aspects of Instant Runoff cause an occasional, but inevitable error: |
||
elimination of the most preferred candidate in 3rd place. (It's because an instant runoff only works perfectly when there are two candidates being compared.) |
elimination of the most preferred candidate in 3rd place. (It's because an instant runoff only works perfectly when there are two candidates being compared.) |
||