Voting system criterion: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (unordered list) |
Psephomancy (talk | contribs) (Wikipedia template) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Wikipedia|Voting criteria}} |
|||
A formally defined pass/fail criterion by which a [[voting system]] may be assessed. |
A formally defined pass/fail criterion by which a [[voting system]] may be assessed. |
||
Revision as of 16:31, 4 October 2019
A formally defined pass/fail criterion by which a voting system may be assessed.
Examples for such criteria are:
- Condorcet criterion
- Consensus Criteria
- Consistency criterion
- Favorite Betrayal criterion
- Generalized Strategy-Free criterion
- Greatest Possible Consensus Criterion
- independence from irrelevant alternatives
- local independence from irrelevant alternatives
- invulnerability to burying
- invulnerability to compromising
- Later-no-harm criterion
- Monotonicity criterion
- Pareto criterion
- Participation criterion
- Plurality criterion
- Schwartz criterion
- Smith criterion (also known as Generalized Condorcet criterion)
- Independence of clones
- Strategy-Free criterion
- Strong Defensive Strategy criterion
- Summability criterion
- Unanimous Consensus Criterion
- Weak Defensive Strategy criterion
This page is a stub - please add to it.