Zero-sum game: Difference between revisions

From electowiki
Content added Content deleted
m (Rewrote language slightly to imply that imperfect/perfect information is orthogonal to zero/non-zero sum.)
mNo edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
A zero-sum game is one in which no wealth is created or destroyed. So, in a two-player zero-sum game, whatever one player wins, the other loses. Therefore, the player share no common interests. Like other games, researchers distinguish between zero-sum games with perfect information and without.
A zero-sum game is one in which no wealth is created or destroyed. So, in a two-player zero-sum game, whatever one player wins, the other loses. Therefore, the player share no common interests. Like other games, researchers distinguish between zero-sum games with perfect information and without.


A single-winner method is a form of "'''zero-sum game'''". There can be only one.
From the candidates' perspective, a single-winner method is a form of "'''zero-sum game'''". There can be only one. It is usually an imperfect information game.


See also: [[Single-member district]]
See also: [[Single-member district]]

Latest revision as of 19:29, 23 January 2024

Wikipedia has an article on:

A zero-sum game is one in which no wealth is created or destroyed. So, in a two-player zero-sum game, whatever one player wins, the other loses. Therefore, the player share no common interests. Like other games, researchers distinguish between zero-sum games with perfect information and without.

From the candidates' perspective, a single-winner method is a form of "zero-sum game". There can be only one. It is usually an imperfect information game.

See also: Single-member district