| Display title | Category talk:Sequential loser-elimination methods |
| Default sort key | Sequential loser-elimination methods |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,499 |
| Namespace ID | 15 |
| Namespace | Category_talk |
| Page ID | 2339 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 22:21, 23 April 2020 |
| Latest editor | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 15:02, 5 May 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 2 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | User:Kristomun, I think there ought to be a generalized category above this one for elimination-based methods that don't eliminate another voting method's loser. For example, Instant Pairwise Elimination usually eliminates the Condorcet loser, but can eliminate a different candidate (who may not be in the Smith loser set) when there isn't one. BetterVotingAdvocacy (talk) 22:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC) |
