| Display title | Center squeeze |
| Default sort key | Center squeeze |
| Page length (in bytes) | 13,232 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 80 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | imported>Homunq |
| Date of page creation | 18:17, 19 October 2016 |
| Latest editor | Kristomun (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 19:14, 4 March 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 32 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 3 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 3 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The center squeeze effect refers to a class of voting scenarios where plurality-based voting systems like instant-runoff voting fail to elect the Condorcet winner and/or utilitarian winner. In such a scenario, the candidates exist along some spectrum from "left" to "right", with a "center" candidate who is preferred to the other candidates, yet who loses the election.[1][2][3][4] |
