Distributed Multi-Voting: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 187: Line 187:
===Tactical vote resistance===
===Tactical vote resistance===


Meets Honesty criterion under the same assumptions as the [[Distributed Voting#Tactical vote resistance|Distributed Voting]].
Meets [[Honesty criterion]] under the same assumptions as the [[Distributed Voting#Tactical vote resistance|Distributed Voting]].


This system also tries to satisfy the [[Honesty criterion|Perfect Honesty criterion]], by applying a conversion of the vote which serves to drastically reduce the deviation from the honest one.
Under the same assumptions as the [[Distributed Voting#Tactical vote resistance|DV]], this system also tries to satisfy the [[Honesty criterion|Perfect Honesty criterion]], by applying a conversion of the vote which serves to drastically reduce the deviation from the honest one.


Example
Example
Line 195: Line 195:
Honest vote: [50 30 15 5 0]
Honest vote: [50 30 15 5 0]
Tactical vote: [90 6 3 1 0]
Tactical vote: [90 6 3 1 0]
Honest converted vote: [1118 820 486 176 0] Points sum = 2600
Honest converted vote: [1118 820 486 176 0]
Tactical coverted vote: [1434 622 390 153 0] Points sum = 2600
Tactical coverted vote: [1434 622 390 153 0]
Absolute difference: [316 198 96 23 0] Points sum = 633
Error in %: [22% 24% 20% 13% 0] Avg error = 20%
633 out of 2600 is around 25%.
633 out of 2600 is around 25%.


On average, about 75% of the vote is honest at the start of the counting, even if the voter used a tactical vote. A good representation of interests is also provided.
On average about 80% of the score, expressed in the tactical vote, is honest at the start of the counting, even if the voter used a tactical vote. A good representation of interests is also provided.


'''Other properties'''
'''Other properties'''